 |
If you want out, it’s not how much you know, it’s what you can prove. I’ve read a lot of science articles and pieces that many of you post because I write them too. Anyone can write whatever they want as I do, but I’ve also written these articles for many large international print magazines with millions of readers. First thing I find out is that their editors reject much more than they’ll print. It’s that whole believeability thing, writing punctuation and scrutinization. They’ll actually fact check your science if they’re interested in using it. Editors are more likely to publish articles that they don’t have to edit! If it’s quantum theory, expect lots of scrutiny.
You can’t just be a published writer without scrutiny when the reputations of others are involved. Like when you’re filing a criminal complaint to the feds; for this reason if they choose to investigate they’ll start with you. They’ll get all into your life; asking why you, who are you – then, what’s your complaint about?
Do you read about the newest high tech gadgetry used in psyops, black ops, intelligence or covert operations? Did you suspect they might be being used on you? You must first differentiate between reality and fiction; good science from bad. Mind reading from listening devices. Is it more likely that there are millions of people having their minds read or are there listening devices everywhere? Every cell phone is a listening device and there are cameras everywhere. It’s beyond easy to track and surveil average people electronically if they’re that interested. Heavy surveillance was too obvious with me but the effort was still astonishing.
We know that all these tech methods and instruments exist because many people report or suspect being victimized, myself included. Though the thing about getting results involves using real laws while appearing sane; not stories or theory. We all read the “Havana Syndrome” attack claims and their alleged victims; CIA, diplomats, government agents. When I filed my case I made it so that a simple investigation would reveal all my accusations because they were believeable. When they ask for proof many people want to explain “DEW” attacks using advanced wave science. These feds are just normal people who will naturally want to know who you are. Don’t say you’re a diplomat unless you are one… More importantly they’re trying to get into your head for motive…
Writing from firsthperson experiences is how I filed my complaint; I’ve also read many of your claims. Sophisticated or experimental type weapons - but where do you fall? One of the first things they’ll want to know when you file is - who are you? Are you prepared to give a theoretical physics lesson on the fly? After writing one of my quantum hypothesis articles, magazine science editors questioned me. One large magazine in NYC (Epoch Times) with millions of readers grilled me. How did I come up with the science - back and forth for several weeks. It won’t publish if you don’t have sensible answers off the top of your head…
Like the feds aren’t just going to investigate every complaint - someone will screen you before considering your case. Listening to many of you, I’m assuming that most people’s complaints get ruled out quick. Not because their not valid but because much of this is unpoven theoretical science like proving Havana or DEW attacks… Usually beyond other jurisdictions people wanting results complain federally.
When you’re proof involves extraordinary science then as the saying goes “extraordinay claims require extradordinary proof.” Do you think that getting results require long science lessons that anyone will understand, listen to or have the time? On the FBI form that I filled out it said include a brief explanation of your complaint and I gave maybe two short paragraphs, remember, ‘this isn’t a form to prove your case’ it’s to pitch it.
When you get deep they will too; “why are all these exotic weapons and methods being used on you?” Not wanting to get deeper I kept everything simple, digestible so they would easily see. I had a lot of strange things happening to me but my mission was results. The sabatoge of vehicles, surveilence, accidents, vandalism, stealthy home breakins with things moved? Planted informers, associates - I left it all out staying simple but I too wondered - why me? I figured those invading my life were getting nervous my words were getting wider exposure. That’s when things really started ramping so be prepared to get your own evidence going counter-covert. The louder you get, the hotter the heat so your light will have to blaze.
While researching I thought I was alone when I found others who called it “Gang stalking.” This was misleading because to me it was more like an organized conspiracy of disruption. Manifested via harrasment and petty crimes like the covert breakins, auto and electronics sabotage… Reading on I can see that some of you are also making a bit more noise than you realize. Like that girl always posting her thoghts, vids. But not being good little victims won’t help you shake free. Everything you post is being archived by default so I’m sure there’s “real” data on you before you ever make a complaint. After all the arrests around me I no longer care or gather evidence but I know that some of you must. Now I read others sharing what they believe right or wrong. Everyone has only to be cautious what they choose to repeat. I just always told the simple truth without depending on difficult or hard science. You have to ask yourself what it is you’re looking for - salutions or information? If it’s good information then it can’t hurt.
Do you picture a happy ending? I see the same things you do and what I see are a lot of people with both good and not so good info. I didn’t choose to write articles about seeing these things but I write about what I see. I began with love lyrics, poetry, science, then I was targeted for sabotage by a corrupt police state. As a freelance article writer it’s not that difficult for me to get published; spelling, punctuation, syntax, grammar, all necessary format of course.
The reward in any of this has to be the satisfaction of exposure. Btw, many people want to believe they are involved in some deep intriguing spy-game drama which is possible but most are simply average targeted citizens.
---Written by the author Robert Torres (2026)
 |
|
